Somewhere between the first hookup and the "Wait, are we exclusive now?" conversation, it's easy to lose track of where you as an individual end and the situationship begins. Your Saturdays become "our" Saturdays. Your opinions start sounding suspiciously like theirs. Somebody asks what you're into lately, and the honest answer is "<insert the name of the person you're dating here>". None of this happens on purpose; it creeps in one small compromise at a time, until a casual thing that turned into something more has slowly become the biggest line on your personal bio.
Psychologists actually have a name for part of this: The inclusion of the other in the self, the idea that when you fall for someone, your sense of who you are naturally starts to expand to include pieces of them. That's not a bad thing on its own. A bit of overlap is what makes a relationship feel close rather than parallel. The trouble starts when the overlap becomes the whole picture, and there's not much "you" left outside the "we."
It rarely looks dramatic from the inside – more a “death by a thousand paper cuts” situation. You skip the gym class you used to love because they text that they're free that night, and it seems easier to just go with them rather than refuse. The friends you used to talk to daily hear from you less, not because anything happened between you, but because what started as casual has somehow started filling most of your weekends. At some point you catch yourself introducing them, even just in your head, as "seeing someone" before you've mentioned anything else about who you are. None of it feels like a decision while it's happening – it's only looking back that you notice how much you gave up of yourself, without either of you ever sitting down and deciding this was a relationship in the first place, or talking about what you both needed to nurture your individualism and unique identities.
Therapists who work with this pattern regularly point out that it often starts from a good place – wanting to make someone happy, wanting the relationship to work, not wanting to rock the boat over something that feels minor. The problem is that boats built entirely around not rocking them tend to go wherever the current takes them, rather than anywhere either person actually chose. So you’re just drifting along, and you’re not in charge of the journey when you really should be.
This isn't really about red flags or someone doing something "wrong", exactly. Plenty of people lose themselves in a casual thing that's going really well, and then the cost shows up later. A version of you with no hobbies of your own, and no opinions your hookup-turned-something-more hasn't already had first, is a harder person to be attracted to over the long run, not an easier one. Interdependence, two whole people choosing to spend time together, tends to hold up better than merging into one identity before you've even had the "what are we" talk. And if things fizzle out, which is always on the table with anything that started casual, the version of you that only existed as half of a pair has some rebuilding to do.
It's less dramatic than it sounds! It's keeping the hobby, the friend group, the Sunday routine that's just yours, even once a casual hookup has slowly turned into someone you see every week. It's having an opinion your person disagrees with and being fine about it. It's being able to answer "What have you been into lately?" without their name being the whole answer. None of this makes what you have any less real or important, it just means the other person gets someone whole to actually be into, rather than a reflection of themselves. Whatever it is you've got going, casual, exclusive, or somewhere in the messy middle, it should be one of the best parts of your life, not the only part left standing.
Read more
Safety
What would women-centred dating safety actually look like?
Safety tips only go so far. Here's what it would actually take to make dating truly safer for women, beyond just individual caution and vigilance alone.
