There is a version of history in which female pleasure was simply never considered important enough to study. That version is, unfortunately, mostly accurate. Unlike its anatomical counterpart, the penis, which was accurately described as early as 35 BCE, the clitoris was not fully anatomically described until 2005. That's not a typo. Two thousand years of medical science, and the organ most directly responsible for female orgasm was essentially glossed over, misnamed, and in some eras, treated as something shameful to be excised rather than understood.
When a French physician dissected the clitoris for the first time in 1545, he named it membre honteux – “the shameful member” – and declared its sole purpose to be urination. Feminist philosopher Nancy Tuana has argued that this ignorance was deliberately constructed, shaped by a political dogma that placed reproduction above pleasure and kept female sexuality conveniently veiled. That ignorance shaped everything downstream: Medical training, sex education, cultural scripts around what sex is supposed to look like and who it's supposed to be for.
It wasn't until 1998, when urologist Helen O'Connell published her findings on the internal structure of the clitoris, that the medical world finally had a true understanding of its size and scope. O'Connell later recalled that her medical training textbooks contained no description of the clitoris at all, while devoting an entire chapter to the /4euroanatomy of the penis. That disparity became the motivation for her life's work. But the fact that it took one determined woman with a dissection kit and a refusal to be dismissed to correct centuries of anatomical record is worth sitting with.
Most people who went through a standard sex education curriculum learned about reproduction, STIs, and (if they were lucky) something about consent. What they almost certainly didn't learn about was female pleasure. Research into sex education curricula has found that when pleasure was discussed at all, it was typically framed alongside dangerous or negative outcomes like unprotected sex, regret, pregnancy, and disease. The message, even when unspoken, was that desire was something to be managed, not explored.
This matters because the gap in education becomes a gap in lived experience. A review of medical school curricula across seven institutions found that only one identified all anatomic components of the clitoris, and only four discussed the physiology of the female orgasm at all. If the doctors treating women don't have a complete picture of female sexual anatomy, it's difficult to imagine how the rest of the conversation was supposed to go. The absence of information isn't neutral by any means! It shapes what people think is normal, what they feel entitled to ask for, and what they assume is possible.
The downstream effect of all of this has a name: The orgasm gap. In a study of more than 50,000 people, 95% of heterosexual men said they usually or always orgasm during sex, compared to 65% of heterosexual women. That 30-point gap is not explained by biology. Research consistently shows that women orgasm more when alone than with a partner, which tells us that the issue isn't anatomy, it's what we've been taught to prioritise in partnered sex.
The comparison across sexual orientations is particularly telling. Women who have sex with women have a significantly higher rate of orgasm than women who have sex with men – around 75% compared to 62%. When female pleasure is centered by both people in the room, the numbers change. That's not a small finding. It suggests that the gap is cultural, not fixed, and that closing it is genuinely within reach.
Research also suggests that the majority of women have faked an orgasm at least once, with studies putting the figure anywhere between 55% and 74% depending on the sample. That's an enormous number of people performing satisfaction they didn't feel, which raises a harder question: Why? The most honest answer is probably a combination of not wanting to make a partner feel bad, not believing their own pleasure was worth the awkwardness of asking for something different and, in some cases, not even being sure what they actually wanted. All of which points back to education, or the lack of it.
Things are changing, slowly and unevenly. Female pleasure has entered mainstream conversation in ways it hadn't a decade ago. Books like Come As You Are by Emily Nagoski and Untamed by Glennon Doyle have reached enormous audiences. Sex-positive media, better representation in some corners of the cultural landscape, and a growing willingness to talk openly about desire have all shifted what feels speakable. But the architecture underneath – medical training, school curricula, the default scripts of heterosexual sex – hasn't kept pace with the conversation.
There's also the question of who the conversation is actually reaching. Pleasure literacy, like most forms of literacy, is not equally distributed. Access to good information, the ability to have open conversations with partners, the confidence to articulate what you want. These things are shaped by class, culture, relationship dynamics, and the kinds of shame that don't disappear just because a few good articles exist.
Knowing your own body is the most fundamental starting point, and also the one most people were actively discouraged from exploring. Masturbation remains under-discussed as a tool for self-knowledge, despite being the most direct way to understand what actually feels good before trying to communicate it to someone else. Curiosity, rather than performance, is the more useful orientation.
Communication is the other lever. Conversations about what you want in bed are easier when they happen outside of it, not as criticism, but as information. Using tools like HUD App’s My Bedroom™ feature to signal preferences upfront is one way to shift the dynamic before it even starts, letting desire lead rather than being negotiated for in the moment.
And reading widely helps. Because cultural factors are responsible for the orgasm gap, changing how we view sex and intercourse is what will actually move the needle. That means consuming media that shows female pleasure as expected rather than exceptional, having honest conversations with friends, and refusing to treat your own satisfaction as an afterthought. None of this is radical! It's just what should have been taught in the first place. The history of female pleasure is largely a history of what was withheld, but the next chapter can be markedly different.
Read more
Community
Finding Pride, losing it, then finding it again
How do you celebrate Pride when you’re still navigating what it means to you? HUD App’s Director of Marketing, Mikayla Robinson, gets honest about Pride.
